|
Title: Finally! Post by: Stuart-Barcelona on February 15, 2006, 04:11:05 AM I was tempted to make huge changes this week, but decided to give those players one last chance.
I'm glad I did now! Another 10 wins like that will do nicely ;) Title: Re: Finally! Post by: Paul-London on February 15, 2006, 04:30:04 AM Yeah good win for you, Marlion Jackson finally came through with a huge game rushing and receiving, hes an excellent dual purpose back. Hutchinson hasnt been brilliant yet but he may come through. Still have a distinct lack of sacks on your team but either way a wins a win
Title: Re: Finally! Post by: Mario ADK on February 15, 2006, 04:34:08 AM may i please have Jackson back?
My running game stinks and Shazor is doing nothing important in the game. ??? Title: Re: Finally! Post by: Paul-London on February 15, 2006, 05:18:47 AM Well Mike Green is back, if i was you i would put him in there as David Allen is a nice little backup but i wouldnt say hes HB1 material.
Shazor is having a very bad year with 12 tackles at the CB1 spot after 4 weeks, just rookie blues, perhaps put him at CB2 ? Either way the Austria secondary is rated 3rd this year when considering a rookie CB1 has been starting the first month you cant really complain. Perhaps as hes so good teams are throwing the other way ? Title: Re: Finally! Post by: Stuart-Barcelona on February 15, 2006, 05:54:00 AM The sacks might be low but I have a pretty good D this year.
Lowest average gain per run for opponents (2.5 yards per carry) with a longest run against of only 15 yards and the 5th ranked Pass D, only 3 TD's through the air against. Now of the O could play like that every week, I would be on track. Title: Re: Finally! Post by: Mario ADK on February 15, 2006, 06:55:40 AM What are the CB-WR-parings anyway?
From what i could read this week it was most likely WR1-CB2 and WR2-CB1? I always thought it is WR1-CB1 and WR2-CB2? Title: Re: Finally! Post by: Niki on February 15, 2006, 07:03:04 AM What are the CB-WR-parings anyway? From what i could read this week it was most likely WR1-CB2 and WR2-CB1? I always thought it is WR1-CB1 and WR2-CB2? if I am correct, the fastest CB covers the fastest WR, but I am not 100% sure about that |